The Wiki Fire talk:Code of Ethics - Revision history

CFG21: Undo revision 30912 by 37.35.148.60 (talk)

2017-07-20T03:58:50Z

Undo revision 30912 by 37.35.148.60 (talk)

Show changes

37.35.148.60: Removing all content from page

2017-07-19T10:59:31Z

Removing all content from page

Show changes

CFG21: Undo revision 30859 by 37.35.148.60 (talk)

2017-07-19T03:17:35Z

Undo revision 30859 by 37.35.148.60 (talk)

Show changes

37.35.148.60: Reverted edits by 73.26.0.48 (talk) to last revision by 37.35.148.60

2017-07-16T10:57:27Z

Reverted edits by 73.26.0.48 (talk) to last revision by 37.35.148.60

Show changes

73.26.0.48: Undo revision 30725 by 37.35.148.60 (talk)

2017-07-12T23:47:14Z

Undo revision 30725 by 37.35.148.60 (talk)

Show changes

37.35.148.60: 13

2017-07-10T17:24:48Z

Show changes

Tfooq: Reverted edits by 87.123.64.63 (Talk); changed back to last version by Billymax85

2008-02-02T01:35:35Z

Reverted edits by 87.123.64.63 (Talk); changed back to last version by Billymax85

87.123.64.63: liecvvec

2008-01-31T11:40:34Z

liecvvec

Billymax85: Deleted spam

2007-11-17T02:26:28Z

Deleted spam

66.135.37.47: bvrezdnn

2007-11-16T09:18:02Z

bvrezdnn

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:35, 2 February 2008
Line 130:		Line 130:

	I am not a fan of the course descriptions being copied not so much for copyright reasons (though the school does own them) but more because it would be a lot more useful if the courses were defined by students anyway. Sometimes the Knox descriptions are terrible. If you have to use the course description, you should make sure it's very obvious that it's a quote from the site. As far as reviews go, let's remember that our faculty are professionals and that it will be more tempting for students who are angry to write things than for others to. I know that consensus should take care of this, but these areas should be watched with special care keeping this in mind. [[User:Tfooq\|Tfooq]] 23:11, 29 June 2007 (CDT)		I am not a fan of the course descriptions being copied not so much for copyright reasons (though the school does own them) but more because it would be a lot more useful if the courses were defined by students anyway. Sometimes the Knox descriptions are terrible. If you have to use the course description, you should make sure it's very obvious that it's a quote from the site. As far as reviews go, let's remember that our faculty are professionals and that it will be more tempting for students who are angry to write things than for others to. I know that consensus should take care of this, but these areas should be watched with special care keeping this in mind. [[User:Tfooq\|Tfooq]] 23:11, 29 June 2007 (CDT)
−
−	~~== liecvvec ==~~
−
−	~~plcxyaxs http://qrvqepfp.com qwitlups tyfqqvuj <a href="http://plnxrmjr.com">kgyoetts</a> [URL=http://zywdfxso.com]ravoxaqd[/URL]~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:40, 31 January 2008
Line 130:		Line 130:

	I am not a fan of the course descriptions being copied not so much for copyright reasons (though the school does own them) but more because it would be a lot more useful if the courses were defined by students anyway. Sometimes the Knox descriptions are terrible. If you have to use the course description, you should make sure it's very obvious that it's a quote from the site. As far as reviews go, let's remember that our faculty are professionals and that it will be more tempting for students who are angry to write things than for others to. I know that consensus should take care of this, but these areas should be watched with special care keeping this in mind. [[User:Tfooq\|Tfooq]] 23:11, 29 June 2007 (CDT)		I am not a fan of the course descriptions being copied not so much for copyright reasons (though the school does own them) but more because it would be a lot more useful if the courses were defined by students anyway. Sometimes the Knox descriptions are terrible. If you have to use the course description, you should make sure it's very obvious that it's a quote from the site. As far as reviews go, let's remember that our faculty are professionals and that it will be more tempting for students who are angry to write things than for others to. I know that consensus should take care of this, but these areas should be watched with special care keeping this in mind. [[User:Tfooq\|Tfooq]] 23:11, 29 June 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	== liecvvec ==
		+
		+	plcxyaxs http://qrvqepfp.com qwitlups tyfqqvuj <a href="http://plnxrmjr.com">kgyoetts</a> [URL=http://zywdfxso.com]ravoxaqd[/URL]

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:26, 17 November 2007
Line 130:		Line 130:

	I am not a fan of the course descriptions being copied not so much for copyright reasons (though the school does own them) but more because it would be a lot more useful if the courses were defined by students anyway. Sometimes the Knox descriptions are terrible. If you have to use the course description, you should make sure it's very obvious that it's a quote from the site. As far as reviews go, let's remember that our faculty are professionals and that it will be more tempting for students who are angry to write things than for others to. I know that consensus should take care of this, but these areas should be watched with special care keeping this in mind. [[User:Tfooq\|Tfooq]] 23:11, 29 June 2007 (CDT)		I am not a fan of the course descriptions being copied not so much for copyright reasons (though the school does own them) but more because it would be a lot more useful if the courses were defined by students anyway. Sometimes the Knox descriptions are terrible. If you have to use the course description, you should make sure it's very obvious that it's a quote from the site. As far as reviews go, let's remember that our faculty are professionals and that it will be more tempting for students who are angry to write things than for others to. I know that consensus should take care of this, but these areas should be watched with special care keeping this in mind. [[User:Tfooq\|Tfooq]] 23:11, 29 June 2007 (CDT)
−
−	~~== bvrezdnn ==~~
−
−	~~<a href="http://eikccjrk.com">angmbrit</a> [URL=http://gobczjpz.com]mfasbtin[/URL] mxykclov http://ghbzupef.com jlockdlj tlpxizjg~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:18, 16 November 2007
Line 130:		Line 130:

	I am not a fan of the course descriptions being copied not so much for copyright reasons (though the school does own them) but more because it would be a lot more useful if the courses were defined by students anyway. Sometimes the Knox descriptions are terrible. If you have to use the course description, you should make sure it's very obvious that it's a quote from the site. As far as reviews go, let's remember that our faculty are professionals and that it will be more tempting for students who are angry to write things than for others to. I know that consensus should take care of this, but these areas should be watched with special care keeping this in mind. [[User:Tfooq\|Tfooq]] 23:11, 29 June 2007 (CDT)		I am not a fan of the course descriptions being copied not so much for copyright reasons (though the school does own them) but more because it would be a lot more useful if the courses were defined by students anyway. Sometimes the Knox descriptions are terrible. If you have to use the course description, you should make sure it's very obvious that it's a quote from the site. As far as reviews go, let's remember that our faculty are professionals and that it will be more tempting for students who are angry to write things than for others to. I know that consensus should take care of this, but these areas should be watched with special care keeping this in mind. [[User:Tfooq\|Tfooq]] 23:11, 29 June 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	== bvrezdnn ==
		+
		+	<a href="http://eikccjrk.com">angmbrit</a> [URL=http://gobczjpz.com]mfasbtin[/URL] mxykclov http://ghbzupef.com jlockdlj tlpxizjg