Difference between revisions of "Talk:Search engine optimization"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I notice that we now have both Georgepgs and a Georgeseo as users, and both of them seem to be posting material that has nothing to do with Knox. I originally figured Georgepgs was a stud...) |
Billymax85 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I notice that we now have both Georgepgs and a Georgeseo as users, and both of them seem to be posting material that has nothing to do with Knox. I originally figured Georgepgs was a student or something who cared about celebrities, but now that seems suspect. Thoughts? [[User:Camozzi|Camozzi]] 18:51, 27 January 2008 (CST) | I notice that we now have both Georgepgs and a Georgeseo as users, and both of them seem to be posting material that has nothing to do with Knox. I originally figured Georgepgs was a student or something who cared about celebrities, but now that seems suspect. Thoughts? [[User:Camozzi|Camozzi]] 18:51, 27 January 2008 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I noticed that too, but Georgepgs isn't posting spam per se. Definitely not Knox-related and definitely illegal to post here, but not spam. Maybe Georgepgs, if he/she is a student, could identify himself/herself as such to someone (either by email or on TWF), just so we don't assume that he/she is a spambot. [[User:Billymax85|Bill M.]] 22:42, 27 January 2008 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:42, 27 January 2008
I notice that we now have both Georgepgs and a Georgeseo as users, and both of them seem to be posting material that has nothing to do with Knox. I originally figured Georgepgs was a student or something who cared about celebrities, but now that seems suspect. Thoughts? Camozzi 18:51, 27 January 2008 (CST)
I noticed that too, but Georgepgs isn't posting spam per se. Definitely not Knox-related and definitely illegal to post here, but not spam. Maybe Georgepgs, if he/she is a student, could identify himself/herself as such to someone (either by email or on TWF), just so we don't assume that he/she is a spambot. Bill M. 22:42, 27 January 2008 (CST)
