Difference between revisions of "Rational Choice Theories of Voting"
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| − | Solutions: | + | possible Solutions to rational choice theory: |
| − | -No cost of voting | + | -No cost of voting <- sort of untrue, voting is costless, registering can add up though. |
| − | -Cost of voting prohibitive | + | -Cost of voting prohibitive <- no evidence of people suffereing from not voting |
| − | -Save democracy (long-term cost) | + | -Save democracy (long-term cost) <- again, no evidence |
| − | -Selective benefits ("good" feeling from voting, civic duty, solidarity, expression of opinion) | + | -Selective benefits ("good" feeling from voting, civic duty, solidarity, expression of opinion)<- inconsistent with Downs, he believe rational choice only applied to economical and political reasoning and that psychological/emotional reasoning do not come into play. |
Revision as of 12:38, 11 October 2008
This lecture was given in PS 240 on 10/6 and continued on 10/8.
Possible exam question
1. Explain the "rational choice theory of voting"
Lecture Material
We covered...
Each potential outcome has a benefit and a cost ( Utility = Benefits - costs )
If the costs of an action outweigh the benefits of that same action, a person will not do that thing.
-So, with voting...if the costs of voting outweigh the benefits of voting, it is irrational to vote
Anthony Downs' An Economic Theory of Democracy -Rational action: to proceed in such a way to use up the lease scarce resources possible per unit of desired output to the best knowledge of the individual (minimizing use of scarce resources, maximizing benefits) -If costs outweigh benefits, the choice is irrational -Restricts rational choice theory to economic and political motivations -"D term" is the civic duty to vote (reduces costs of voting, does not impact how people vote, rather if they vote at all) -So now.... Utility = Benefits - costs + D
Standards of Rationality:
-Able to make a decision if presented with options -Rank order of preferences -Transitive preferences -Choose most preferred option -Same decisions made time and time again
Rational choice theory-issues with disproving it
-one can change the inputs to get the right explanation
possible Solutions to rational choice theory:
-No cost of voting <- sort of untrue, voting is costless, registering can add up though.
-Cost of voting prohibitive <- no evidence of people suffereing from not voting
-Save democracy (long-term cost) <- again, no evidence
-Selective benefits ("good" feeling from voting, civic duty, solidarity, expression of opinion)<- inconsistent with Downs, he believe rational choice only applied to economical and political reasoning and that psychological/emotional reasoning do not come into play.