Difference between revisions of "Libel law"
(Undo revision 4078 by Special:Contributions/72.26.64.186 (User talk:72.26.64.186)) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
8================================================================D ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ [[User:72.26.64.186|72.26.64.186]] indie | 8================================================================D ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ [[User:72.26.64.186|72.26.64.186]] indie | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Who is a public figure or public official? === | ||
+ | |||
+ | A public official, according to the Supreme Court, is someone who has a substantial amount of control over governmental affairs. A public figure is either a celebrity whose name has become a household word or a person who has voluntarily stepped into a role of leadership in a particular controversy. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the case of ''New York Times Company v. Sullivan'', 376 U.S. 254 (1964), the Supreme Court held that in order for a public figure/official to prove libel, they must prove malicious intent. Malice is the idea that whoever published the libelous statement did so knowingly and intentionally or was reckless in fact-checking before publication. | ||
+ | |||
+ | But for private citizens - that is everyone who is not a public figure/official - they need only prove a reporter's negligence to prove libel. |
Revision as of 18:45, 18 May 2007
libel ->
8================================================================D ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 72.26.64.186 indie
Who is a public figure or public official?
A public official, according to the Supreme Court, is someone who has a substantial amount of control over governmental affairs. A public figure is either a celebrity whose name has become a household word or a person who has voluntarily stepped into a role of leadership in a particular controversy.
In the case of New York Times Company v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), the Supreme Court held that in order for a public figure/official to prove libel, they must prove malicious intent. Malice is the idea that whoever published the libelous statement did so knowingly and intentionally or was reckless in fact-checking before publication.
But for private citizens - that is everyone who is not a public figure/official - they need only prove a reporter's negligence to prove libel.