Campaign Finance
This is a page for students of PS 240. On November 3rd and 7th we discussed campaign finance.
Possible Exam Questions
- Nobody has suggested any yet.
Readings
B. Alexander (2005). Good Money and Bad Money: Do Funding Sources Affect Electoral Outcomes? Political Research Quarterly, 58, 353-358.
- Summary:
K. Bardwell (2003). Not All Money Is Equal: The Differential Effect of Spending by Incumbents and Challengers in Gubernatorial Primaries. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 3, 294-308.
- Summary:
G.C. Jacobson (2006). Campaign spending effects in U.S. Senate elections: Evidence from the National Annenberg Election Survey. Electoral Studies, 25, 195-226.
- Summary: Overall, this study finds that challengers' increased spending benefits them more than increased spending helps incumbents. Over time, challengers gained support in direct proportion to their level of spending. Incumbents adjusted their spending in response to their challengers' spending and during this time the incumbents' familiarity and favorability increased as well but this change was not directly related to the incumbent's level of spending. Also, increased spending on this side of the challenger is a sign of electoral strength. This kind of a change in spending demonstrates that the challenger feels he or she has a chance at winning the election. On the other hand, increased spending for the incumbent is a sign of electoral weakness. If an incumbent spends more, this study suggests it is because he or she is trying to keep up with his or her challenger in the election.
K.M. Esterling (2007). Buying Expertise: Campaign Contributions and Attention to Policy Analysis in Congressional Committees. American Political Science Review, 101, 93-109.
- Summary:
M.C. Fellowes and Wolf, P. J. (2004). Funding Mechanisms and Policy Instruments: How Business Campaign Contributions Influence Congressional Votes. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 315-324.
- Summary:
S.B. Gordon (2001). All Votes Are Not Created Equal: Campaign Contributions and Critical Votes. Journal of Politics, 63, 249.
- Summary: