Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gizmo Gil"

From The Wiki Fire
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: What in the fuck is Gizmo Gil? The page is too vague. Being esoteric is one thing but not giving a coherent explanation for the inside joke is just pointless.)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
What in the fuck is Gizmo Gil? The page is too vague. Being esoteric is one thing but not giving a coherent explanation for the inside joke is just pointless.
 
What in the fuck is Gizmo Gil? The page is too vague. Being esoteric is one thing but not giving a coherent explanation for the inside joke is just pointless.
 +
 +
*I agree. Let's give this page a day or two to explain itself, then we will take it down. This could be a standard rule for really vague inside jokes.
 +
P.S. You should sign comments like these by typing <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> afterwards.[[User:Tfooq|Tfooq]] 15:39, 12 May 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 13:39, 12 May 2007

What in the fuck is Gizmo Gil? The page is too vague. Being esoteric is one thing but not giving a coherent explanation for the inside joke is just pointless.

  • I agree. Let's give this page a day or two to explain itself, then we will take it down. This could be a standard rule for really vague inside jokes.

P.S. You should sign comments like these by typing ~~~~ afterwards.Tfooq 15:39, 12 May 2007 (CDT)