Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hard Rock Cafe"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(copied?) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==copied?== | ==copied?== | ||
Was this copied from somewhere?[[User:Tfooq|Tfooq]] 15:34, 27 May 2007 (CDT) | Was this copied from somewhere?[[User:Tfooq|Tfooq]] 15:34, 27 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Answer: yes. From Wikipedia ... we should come up with a final decision about whether Wikipedia pages are good or not for the site.[[User:Tfooq|Tfooq]] 15:36, 27 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Assuming it's even legal... I'd say that as far as we're concerned, copying wikipedia content to serve as general explanation on a topic should be OK, but then an original contribution should be added explaining the link to knox. We don't just want to host a bunch of random wikipedia content unrelated to knox. | ||
Latest revision as of 11:07, 28 May 2007
copied?[edit]
Was this copied from somewhere?Tfooq 15:34, 27 May 2007 (CDT)
Answer: yes. From Wikipedia ... we should come up with a final decision about whether Wikipedia pages are good or not for the site.Tfooq 15:36, 27 May 2007 (CDT)
Assuming it's even legal... I'd say that as far as we're concerned, copying wikipedia content to serve as general explanation on a topic should be OK, but then an original contribution should be added explaining the link to knox. We don't just want to host a bunch of random wikipedia content unrelated to knox.
