Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jeremy Doebert"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Billymax85 (talk | contribs) (New page: In light of Tom's question about Ashkay Gavai's entry, I guess I should ask if Jeremy is ok with this. Jeremy, if you're reading, post here and let us know if having this stuff up there is...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In light of Tom's question about Ashkay Gavai's entry, I guess I should ask if Jeremy is ok with this. Jeremy, if you're reading, post here and let us know if having this stuff up there is cool. [[User:Billymax85|Bill M.]] 20:49, 17 August 2007 (CDT) | In light of Tom's question about Ashkay Gavai's entry, I guess I should ask if Jeremy is ok with this. Jeremy, if you're reading, post here and let us know if having this stuff up there is cool. [[User:Billymax85|Bill M.]] 20:49, 17 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | We've been through this discussion before, and according to [[User:Johnlane|Johnlane]]'s note to his 20 May revision, Jeremy had no problem with the content. The author of the article just reaffirmed that to me, so I think we're okay on this one. [[User:Camozzi|Camozzi]] 04:31, 18 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:31, 18 August 2007
In light of Tom's question about Ashkay Gavai's entry, I guess I should ask if Jeremy is ok with this. Jeremy, if you're reading, post here and let us know if having this stuff up there is cool. Bill M. 20:49, 17 August 2007 (CDT)
We've been through this discussion before, and according to Johnlane's note to his 20 May revision, Jeremy had no problem with the content. The author of the article just reaffirmed that to me, so I think we're okay on this one. Camozzi 04:31, 18 August 2007 (CDT)
