Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dan Morgridge"
(libel gray area. Please read and add your thoughts.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Questions of libel == | == Questions of libel == | ||
Dan's page has existed in a libel gray area since it's creation. This may be a situation in which we must make a decision. Is publishing that somebody makes out with people libelous? If Dan does not want this published, then it should be taken down without questions. But if he does not mind (or does not know) is it OK? This is more of a theoretical question concerning the future of the site than a question about Dan. Please add your thoughts. [[User:Tfooq|Tfooq]] 18:28, 13 May 2007 (CDT) | Dan's page has existed in a libel gray area since it's creation. This may be a situation in which we must make a decision. Is publishing that somebody makes out with people libelous? If Dan does not want this published, then it should be taken down without questions. But if he does not mind (or does not know) is it OK? This is more of a theoretical question concerning the future of the site than a question about Dan. Please add your thoughts. [[User:Tfooq|Tfooq]] 18:28, 13 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | A friend made most of this current entry, which seems to be in good sport. the STD bits were a bit tasteless (although by a different friend) but as it stands, I'm fine with the representation as presented here (although the jowling picture...man.) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Basically, to expand this beyond myself: let's not be jerks, but lets have fun as long as everyone involved is having fun. It's a wiki for godssakes. [[User:Dancomono|Dancomono]] 00:09, 20 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:10, 19 July 2007
Questions of libel
Dan's page has existed in a libel gray area since it's creation. This may be a situation in which we must make a decision. Is publishing that somebody makes out with people libelous? If Dan does not want this published, then it should be taken down without questions. But if he does not mind (or does not know) is it OK? This is more of a theoretical question concerning the future of the site than a question about Dan. Please add your thoughts. Tfooq 18:28, 13 May 2007 (CDT)
A friend made most of this current entry, which seems to be in good sport. the STD bits were a bit tasteless (although by a different friend) but as it stands, I'm fine with the representation as presented here (although the jowling picture...man.)
Basically, to expand this beyond myself: let's not be jerks, but lets have fun as long as everyone involved is having fun. It's a wiki for godssakes. Dancomono 00:09, 20 July 2007 (CDT)