Difference between revisions of "Talk:O2C"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(needs discussion) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==impending edit war== | ==impending edit war== | ||
i sense an edit war about to start ( if it hasn't already). Obviously someone doesn't like this page being here, so let's talk it out and see what kind of solution we can come up with. [[User:Tfooq|Tfooq]] 02:43, 2 October 2007 (CDT) | i sense an edit war about to start ( if it hasn't already). Obviously someone doesn't like this page being here, so let's talk it out and see what kind of solution we can come up with. [[User:Tfooq|Tfooq]] 02:43, 2 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I've already rolled back a first set of deletes on this article last week or so. Personally, I don't see how TWF can do without an article on this organization, since it was all over the school in 04-05. I think the best solution is semiprotection, paired with perhaps some minor cleanup of the article. [[User:Camozzi|Camozzi]] 02:48, 2 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:48, 2 October 2007
impending edit war[edit]
i sense an edit war about to start ( if it hasn't already). Obviously someone doesn't like this page being here, so let's talk it out and see what kind of solution we can come up with. Tfooq 02:43, 2 October 2007 (CDT)
I've already rolled back a first set of deletes on this article last week or so. Personally, I don't see how TWF can do without an article on this organization, since it was all over the school in 04-05. I think the best solution is semiprotection, paired with perhaps some minor cleanup of the article. Camozzi 02:48, 2 October 2007 (CDT)
