Difference between revisions of "Talk:ART 119"
m (Talk:Art 119 moved to Talk:ART 119: Complying with Knox course code convention) |
|
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 22:00, 22 June 2007
This is not going to go anywhere, I don't think. I am okay with the idea of having pages about each class, but they should have a point and have content. Tfooq 22:06, 22 June 2007 (CDT)
I agree that this particular page is poorly fleshed out, but I don't think we should delete it just because of that. I would personally like to see more pages develop around classes, and, humble though this article may be, it's a pinky toe in the door. 24.23.45.57 00:30, 23 June 2007 (CDT)
Sorry, the above was me. I haven't taken this class, but I'm going to flesh it out using the course catalog, to try and develop a template for other course pages. Camozzi 00:33, 23 June 2007 (CDT)
Okay. Having done so, I've removed the deletion template. Are we happy with the result? Would this be a good general format to use with all other course pages? Camozzi 00:55, 23 June 2007 (CDT)
