Difference between revisions of "Talk:Magdalena Tortoriello"
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Does anyone know if the "penis" on this page is relevant (vs. vandalism)? | Does anyone know if the "penis" on this page is relevant (vs. vandalism)? | ||
--[[User:Stockholm syndrome|Stockholm syndrome]] 14:32, 22 July 2007 (CDT) | --[[User:Stockholm syndrome|Stockholm syndrome]] 14:32, 22 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Well, according to the history it was added in an edit along with a lot of other standard biographical information, by somebody who is in the same sorority and a Facebook friend of the article subject. Given the context, I don't think it counts as vandalism. [[User:Camozzi|Camozzi]] 17:07, 22 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yeah, while it's not vandalism, I don't really see why it was there. If you see things like that that don't bring anything to the table, so to speak, I say just delete it. If someone really likes it, they will put it back. [[User:Tfooq|Tfooq]] 19:19, 24 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think we should be careful deleting things that may be in-jokes and the like. While they may not make sense to most of us, they seem to be a popular use of TWF, and as such risky to crack down on, if we want to maintain traffic. [[User:Camozzi|Camozzi]] 20:15, 24 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:15, 24 July 2007
Does anyone know if the "penis" on this page is relevant (vs. vandalism)? --Stockholm syndrome 14:32, 22 July 2007 (CDT)
Well, according to the history it was added in an edit along with a lot of other standard biographical information, by somebody who is in the same sorority and a Facebook friend of the article subject. Given the context, I don't think it counts as vandalism. Camozzi 17:07, 22 July 2007 (CDT)
Yeah, while it's not vandalism, I don't really see why it was there. If you see things like that that don't bring anything to the table, so to speak, I say just delete it. If someone really likes it, they will put it back. Tfooq 19:19, 24 July 2007 (CDT)
I think we should be careful deleting things that may be in-jokes and the like. While they may not make sense to most of us, they seem to be a popular use of TWF, and as such risky to crack down on, if we want to maintain traffic. Camozzi 20:15, 24 July 2007 (CDT)
