Difference between revisions of "Alleged Campus Safety Misconduct"
(Not a discussion page, yet. See discussion. Counter-counters removed, and counters edited for clarity (hopefully--original author, clarify if you feel the need).) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
===Friday, May 16 (part 1)=== | ===Friday, May 16 (part 1)=== | ||
Just after midnight, a [[Campus Safety|campus safety]] officer detained two students walking in the basement of [[SMC]] and accused them of removing signs from bathroom doors and demanded to search one of their bags. When the students refused the search on the basis of their 4th amendment rights, the officer lied to them, saying that those rights did not apply on private property, and called the police. the police officer who searched AND violated the student's 4th amendment rights told the campus safety officer, "we cannot legally search them", however proceeded to searching both students, without a warrant and without consent. | Just after midnight, a [[Campus Safety|campus safety]] officer detained two students walking in the basement of [[SMC]] and accused them of removing signs from bathroom doors and demanded to search one of their bags. When the students refused the search on the basis of their 4th amendment rights, the officer lied to them, saying that those rights did not apply on private property, and called the police. the police officer who searched AND violated the student's 4th amendment rights told the campus safety officer, "we cannot legally search them", however proceeded to searching both students, without a warrant and without consent. | ||
| − | ** In not having conducted a search, Campus Safety cannot have infringed on anyone's Constitutional rights. | + | ** In not having conducted a search, Campus Safety cannot have infringed on anyone's 4th Amendment Constitutional rights. |
Revision as of 00:39, 20 June 2008
This page has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- see discussion page
If you can improve the page, please edit it. Once you have done so, you may remove this template. Please explain why you think the page deserves to stay on the discussion page or in your edit summary.
This page may be deleted within a couple days if no improvements are made. Please check the article history to see when this template was added.
Like the Campus Safety Log, but with a different spin.
Contents
Instances of Alleged Misconduct
Currently, the allegation comes first, followed by a chance for rebuttal or any other kind of argument against the allegation and the evidence used to support it. This page is currently under heavy discussion, so visit the Discussion page and join in.
Friday, May 16 (part 1)
Just after midnight, a campus safety officer detained two students walking in the basement of SMC and accused them of removing signs from bathroom doors and demanded to search one of their bags. When the students refused the search on the basis of their 4th amendment rights, the officer lied to them, saying that those rights did not apply on private property, and called the police. the police officer who searched AND violated the student's 4th amendment rights told the campus safety officer, "we cannot legally search them", however proceeded to searching both students, without a warrant and without consent.
- In not having conducted a search, Campus Safety cannot have infringed on anyone's 4th Amendment Constitutional rights.
Friday, May 16 (part 2)
Late, after Girl Talk, Campus Safety called the police on an intoxicated student who was on campus, violating the Good Samaritan policy.
- The Good Samaritan policy only protects students from college rules, not federal, state, or local laws.
Sunday, May 18
In the early morning, a student left belongings in Founders, while computers were restarting, and Campus Safety took the liberty of searching the students personal belongings, without the student present, or consent from that student.
- Good faith searches of unattended property in order to identify an owner are neither unlawful nor uncommon.
Wednesday, May 21
Campus security was seen and over heard referencing the use of pepper spray on a student during the afternoon.
- Unfounded. Also, "referencing" is not misconduct.
