Difference between revisions of "Talk:Magdalena Tortoriello"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Well, according to the history it was added in an edit along with a lot of other standard biographical information, by somebody who is in the same sorority and a Facebook friend of the article subject. Given the context, I don't think it counts as vandalism. [[User:Camozzi|Camozzi]] 17:07, 22 July 2007 (CDT) | Well, according to the history it was added in an edit along with a lot of other standard biographical information, by somebody who is in the same sorority and a Facebook friend of the article subject. Given the context, I don't think it counts as vandalism. [[User:Camozzi|Camozzi]] 17:07, 22 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Yeah, while it's not vandalism, I don't really see why it was there. If you see things like that that don't bring anything to the table, so to speak, I say just delete it. If someone really likes it, they will put it back. [[User:Tfooq|Tfooq]] 19:19, 24 July 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 17:19, 24 July 2007
Does anyone know if the "penis" on this page is relevant (vs. vandalism)? --Stockholm syndrome 14:32, 22 July 2007 (CDT)
Well, according to the history it was added in an edit along with a lot of other standard biographical information, by somebody who is in the same sorority and a Facebook friend of the article subject. Given the context, I don't think it counts as vandalism. Camozzi 17:07, 22 July 2007 (CDT)
Yeah, while it's not vandalism, I don't really see why it was there. If you see things like that that don't bring anything to the table, so to speak, I say just delete it. If someone really likes it, they will put it back. Tfooq 19:19, 24 July 2007 (CDT)