Difference between revisions of "Talk:Steam Pipe Network"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: What should we do with things like the myth part of this article? If someone writes a creative thing (not that this is TOO clever), I feel bad deleting it. Should we just give it it's own ...) |
GreatHeights (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What should we do with things like the myth part of this article? If someone writes a creative thing (not that this is TOO clever), I feel bad deleting it. Should we just give it it's own section or get rid of it?[[User:Tfooq|Tfooq]] 00:37, 18 May 2007 (CDT) | What should we do with things like the myth part of this article? If someone writes a creative thing (not that this is TOO clever), I feel bad deleting it. Should we just give it it's own section or get rid of it?[[User:Tfooq|Tfooq]] 00:37, 18 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Well, I agree that we don't want to go willy nilly deleting the funny and creative things people come up with. However, to put something as a "Myth" implies that its well known around campus and isn't something that just popped into Enyart's head. I think we can use discretion on a case by case basis, and in this case, I don't see the merit of the "Myth" section. [[User:GreatHeights|GreatHeights]] 08:43, 18 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 05:43, 18 May 2007
What should we do with things like the myth part of this article? If someone writes a creative thing (not that this is TOO clever), I feel bad deleting it. Should we just give it it's own section or get rid of it?Tfooq 00:37, 18 May 2007 (CDT)
Well, I agree that we don't want to go willy nilly deleting the funny and creative things people come up with. However, to put something as a "Myth" implies that its well known around campus and isn't something that just popped into Enyart's head. I think we can use discretion on a case by case basis, and in this case, I don't see the merit of the "Myth" section. GreatHeights 08:43, 18 May 2007 (CDT)
